Recent anti-immigration protests in Australian cities reflect concerns about the high levels of annual immigration and its perceived impact on the Australian way of life, identity, and culture. Some participants express genuine unease about the changing nature of society and the shifting population demographics, particularly in major urban centres.
However, are these societal changes solely the result of immigration? Why does the government maintain high immigration levels? Common justifications include the need to fill skill shortages and attract global talent—an increasingly competitive pursuit worldwide.
But this raises further questions. Why are most immigrants funnelled into already overcrowded major cities? Is the government doing enough to develop infrastructure that links major cities with regional centres to relieve urban pressure?
In New South Wales, at least, the answer appears to be no. Billions are being invested in expanding transport infrastructure within Sydney, such as the $25 billion Parramatta to Sydney Metro. Meanwhile, regional projects—like the proposed reactivation of the rail link from Armidale to Queensland—remain ignored, despite repeated community calls and a comparatively modest $1 billion required investment for 210kms.
This reflects a pattern of regional neglect by state governments that disproportionately focus on metropolitan areas. Soaring housing prices and the rising cost of living in major cities are pushing people to move to regional areas that often lack adequate rail connectivity and rely heavily on air or road transport.
At the root of this imbalance is a structural flaw in our political system. Decision-making is heavily influenced by powerful lobby groups, and regional electorates—often non-marginal—receive less political attention both during and after elections.
Immigrants, like many working or unemployed Australians, have become pawns in a much larger economic and political game. The real issue lies in the unjust and unequal distribution of resources, rising living costs, and an infrastructure strategy that overlooks regional needs.
Improved connectivity between regional areas and major cities is essential for building a coherent and united society. The current discontent stems not from immigration itself, but from successive governments failing to act in the interests of all Australians—urban and regional alike.
Got something on your mind? Go on then, engage. Submit your opinion piece, letter to the editor, or Quick Word now.
Yes the regions do suffer from poor connectivity, and poor Infrastructure. Regional people will not get these issues fixed without a growing population.
Poor planning is a problem yes – I went up to a bull sale at Bingara the other week – the road thru north Tamworth is only single lane with the option to turn right in a right hand turning lane or the option to pull off and turn into a local street for each specific house.
There was no room to make the main drag double lanes which I see as poor planning by a past Tamworth regional council. Sadly these issues only become apparent many years after the concilors / planning people within concil who make the decision have likely moved on.
Immigrants are not the problem, this country was built by immigrants. What is the problem is wreckless out of control mass immigration being used to prop up a failing economy caused by mismanagement by a socialist government.
Don Burmy Australia does not experience mass immigration, you are thinking of nations in the northern hemisphere. But it is very Australian of us not to help with the heavy lifting of global issues.
Annabel Doherty not sure what planet your living on?
Don Burmy same one as you mate, but great response.
Don Burmy we don’t have mass-immigration. What we do have are white nationalists in government and in the media spreading misinformation about mass-immigration so you don’t blame billionaires for hoarding wealth, holding thousands of liveable homes empty so they can claim tax breaks, and artificially inflate scarcity to drive up profits.
To blame the individual immigrants is reckless & just plain stupid. Who wouldn’t want to come to Australia for a chance at a better life?
The issue is the current government allowing a reported 1500 immigrants every single day.
1500 extra people every day which exacerbates an already crippling housing crisis, adds to the health care burden, & adds pressure to already strained infrastructure.
Ed should be allowing immigration, but at a much lower level, & allowing people who will add value to our society, like healthcare workers & first responders. Not dog groomers & nannies!
Steve Coxhead dog groomers and nannies don’t add value to our society? Good Dawg!
Annabel Doherty remember when LNP folks said it was okay when Dutton exercised his authoriy to grant an au pair citizenship over a sick child, because the child was born to assylum seekers?
Steve Coxhead 1500 people a day falsely reported. That number includes people travelling from overseas coming back home to Australia, those on holiday, those visiting for business. The housing issue is on property investors holding thousands of liveable homes empty to get tax breaks and increase scarcity to push up prices.
Shane McGee in 2022/23 the net migration figure was reported by Australian Bureau of Statistics as 536,000, or 1522 per day.
In 2023/24 it was 446,000 or 1267 per day.
So migration and immigration aren’t the same thing.
also those number shows migration is down.
Steve Coxhead context tells us that occurred after we opened up again post covid. Stats for the previous years are also important. Locking the country down again means implosion is closer.
Migration and sustaining a near 8.3 billion (to be around 9 billion before 2040) is an extremely important issue. The northern hemisphere experiences mass migration, Australia does not. It is a global issue and Australia is not lifting its weight globally. We should be talking about sustainability both domestically and globally, we should be assisting at a global level.
Immigrants do not cause problems in Australia, Australians and Australian policy does.
Annabel Doherty I am talking about sustainability domestically. That’s all we should be talking about. We should be able to properly look after people who are within our borders. What we are doing now is not sustainable.
Steve Coxhead so do you agree that property investors who are holding thousands of homes empty to create manufured scarcity should be held accountable for those practices? Or are you going continue playing into white nationalists narrative that immigrants are the issue?
Sick of politicians. Enough is enough! The government and police must stop persecuting my daughter who has hearing impaired and I who is her single mother. Please support our application to the high court to stop the Commonwealth has persecuting us as we are Australian citizens. Fighting 💪Media: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=122181206936389654&set=p.122181206936389654&type=3