Posted inFeatured, Political

Rail trail. Episode 10. The saga continues.

Why are Armidale Regional Council, along with Glen Innes Severn Council as their partner in the crime of the century, continuing to flog the dead and beaten horse to try to get it across the line and waste more time while pilfering ratepayers’ hard-earned cash to fund the rail trail project that has drastically failed? I thought it was dead. At least that’s what Sam said. But like a ghost from Halloween, it’s back from the dead.

Councils around the country are throwing rail trail ideas out over the financials, yet meanwhile Armidale and Glen councils are using ratepayers’ funds to revive the dead horse, with another one and a half million dollars looking set to be flushed down the sewer, with no guarantee there will even be grants big enough to fund the rail trail of broken dreams and broken hearts. They tried. It failed. Nothing has been learnt, and the stubbornness continues. Now they are just throwing effort and money at more foolishness.

The public was led to believe the New England Rail Trail would be a 200-kilometre tourist attraction that would put us on the map and bring international fame and national applause. Now it’s been reduced to a local bike path and gone completely off the rails. It’s lost its scope and all hope. Even if they could pull a rabbit out of their magic hat and find money growing on a government tree somewhere to complete it to its promised full length and potential, it would cost well over 100 million dollars to build.

To complete it and make it an actual tourist attraction that would gain worldwide recognition, well, that would need another appointment with a bank manager. To be continued… Then there are the bills to pay, the lawns to mow, the bridges to fix, the toilets to clean, and the advertisers to pay. Even the Gold Coast has to advertise to attract tourist dollars from across the globe.

After dropping numbers on the Northern Rivers trail, they’ve had to employ a trail manager to manage and promote it, with an advertised handsome salary package of $100,000 a year plus perks to try to get the pedalling in motion and get people to come back. It seems it’s been ticked and flicked, and everyone’s gone on to their next photo opportunity — another fleeting moment in the rail trail fad. Once you’ve done it, you’ve done it. On to the next leg of the dying horse.

“New England Rail Trail: been there, done that” might be the best T-shirt merch opportunity, because that’s what happens. Along with “I survived the New England Rail Trail on a cold and icy winter’s day” for a bumper sticker. There are cool climates, and then there’s just too cold to go outside — wind chill cruising along at 20 knots in Lycra with icicles up your nose.

For six to nine months of the year, those coastal people who think anything below 15 degrees is freezing point definitely won’t be moving from the fireplace to go riding, no matter how many tourist dollars you think you might make selling thermal underwear to unaware tourists who didn’t realise it was going to be this cold. Not many are training for Everest these days — that’s already been conquered, and the novelty has worn off too.

Bali seems to be the big winner: cheap, cheap, cheap. It is a cost-of-living crisis, after all. Everyone’s tightening their spending — except the councils, who seem to be throwing around other people’s hard-earned cash without a care in the world. Meanwhile, we’re giving up coffee and avo on toast to pay off our mortgages and power bills, so I’m not sure how all these cafés will survive.

The average Australian is finding it harder and harder to put fuel in the car, let alone take time off work to have a holiday. And if they are holidaying or doing their big lap, they’re pretty self-sufficient in a 4WD or caravan with all the mod cons, looking for the cheapest possible place to park up — the freer, the better. Luckily, in NSW you can sleep in your car and it’s not a crime, unlike Queensland where they’re forced to pay for accommodation.

Of course, stealth car camping won’t become a by-product of a rail trail, so the car dwellers caught in the rental crisis have somewhere to go — well, at least until we put up no camping signs everywhere. Of course, they cost money too. I guess just put it on the tab and send the bill to the ratepayers.

Luckily, it’s always too cold in winter here, so for six months of the year that won’t be a problem. The trail won’t come without problems. Just ask New Zealand ratepayers how they feel about rising rates to accommodate tourists. Of course, the small few who are cashing in don’t have much to complain about. Meanwhile, the rest of us foot the bills and go without. No avo on toast with a latte on the side for the rest of us. Some of us have to sacrifice.

Perhaps the council might give us jobs picking up rubbish left behind by all the projected incoming tourists. By the time this is over, we’ll need two jobs to pay the rent — or maybe we can just become stealth campers beside the rail trail we’ve been lumped with funding. At least then we’d get some form of benefit and use from it.

Happy camping, everyone.


Got something on your mind? Go on then, engage. Submit your opinion piece, letter to the editor, or Quick Word now.

Share

Join the Conversation

55 Comments

  1. The saga continues because both Mayors have their heads in the clouds and their wallets at the local trucking depot!

  2. Rather than a dead horse, how about considering, just for a moment, a two horse race with tourism rail side by side? Warm in winters and ideal for the non-pedalling but cashed up grey nomad set who like a bit of nostalgia and passing views with a degree of comfort. The single minded focus of the councils is the most annoying aspect of this saga.

    1. David Rose That was suggested to the rail trail lobby and councils but knocked back. They want it all.

      1. David Renn
        It’s the funding of rail that is the problem. No govt is prepared to put up the cash.

      2. Andrew Fraser Disagree. This has become a personal battle between ARC Mayor Sham and the progressive ratepayers wanting an affordable passenger rail service from Armidale to Jennings Wallangarra.

        What makes the bike path case so amoral is that Mayor Sham is being paid a huge honorarium to misspend ratepayers funds for his personal ego project. 😩😩😩😩😩

      3. Andrew Fraser probably because the line has been disused for 35+ years now, and no government has made mention of restoring it to operational service.

      4. Jack Arnold the debate on the table is can the councils afford a rail trail?
        Without guaranteed government funding, and a huge political donar sponser, it’s most likely still even with that going to be a huge burden upon the ratepayers.
        Show me the money 🤑

    2. David Rose ever since the trail was first considered, the anti-trail supporters have made these suggestions, and none of them have produced even an idea of a business plan to support it. Council has been presented the business case (revised numerous time thanks to inaction or withdrawn funding) by NERT. They have actually put in the work.

  3. I’m interested to see their design for the trail in the parts where bridges are needed. Because if the bridges are going to get rebuilt for the purpose of a swl for users they’d turn into a pretty big endeavour. If the trail is going to go down to ground level to cross these drainage points the erosion would be an issue throughout rainy periods. 🤣 must be good to think there’s no other ways of getting “ tourism” into the town.

    1. Chris Thompson have you been on the Brisbane Valley Rail Trail or the Northern Rivers Rail Trail ?
      Both have places with diversions off the railway embankment down into and over the creek beds , not a problem . FYI the Northern Rivers NSW has rainfall in excess of 1300mm per year .

      1. Geoff Bensley do they leave the bridges there to rot like the Sunnyside bridge here?
        Or do they spend hundreds of thousands to millions on them as they have done with some bridges on bvrt
        Or do they go for the foot bridges like on the northern rivers that gets flooded everytime it rains and needs repairs because it’s under the flood line. Or does it end up like NZ where the tracks get shut because there’s no money to fix the bridges?

      2. Tanya Langdon oh the good old Sunnyside Bridge that has sat for over 30 years deteriorating and collapsing . Such a shame .

      3. Tanya Langdon oh the NZ rail trail has opened again after the tragic weather event . The NZ government spends so much money on their cycling/walking trails as they attract international visitors and domestic visitors .
        Such a shame that the wonderful Taerie Gorge heritage tourist train doesn’t go all the way to Middlemarch anymore , the cost to repair the bridges up through the gorge is out of reach even for such a popular tourist train company

      4. Geoff Bensley the NZ council spent two years begging and groveling to the government to fix the bridge so the trail could be reopened. The rate payers rates there rose 18% they simply couldn’t squeeze any more money out of them for bridge repairs.
        The costs to repair and maintain even pedestrian bridges isn’t cheap, and they’re usually done cheaply so they require maintenance often,
        Not many good old bridges like the Sunnyside one that lasted over 100 years, at least they build rail bridges to last well into the future.
        You get what you pay for I guess.

  4. A New England rail trail from Uralla to Stanthorpe would be a raging success and would boost local economies. New England has far more going for it compared to the highly successful Brisbane Valley Rail Trail. As an outsider who loves the New England region I can’t believe that locals aren’t fully behind it. At least the politicians know they’re on to a good thing.

    1. Nick Stevens oh good you can come down pay to ride it and join the club and chip in for some maintenance while your here.

    2. Nick Stevens Well, as a long time New England resident I believe that ARC and GISC are morally bound to support the renovation and reopening of the Main North Line between Armidale and Jennings Wallangarra to provide affordable passenger rail service connection to the world.

      Nick Stevens: When you have completed a fully costed proposal for how you want other people to spend their already too expensive council rates, then post it on an appropriate FB page. Then pick up yourself, your family and move house to a Council LGA that will benefit from your proposal.

      1. Jack you’re kidding, right? There’s barely enough passengers to support a bus connection to the Armidale Xplorer, who’s going to pay to reinstate the line to the border?!?

      2. Robin Wills the debate is not trains v bikes, the debate on the table is can the councils afford to build and maintain a rail trail? And without guaranteed government funding and a huge sponser, the answer is, no they can’t afford a rail trail project.

      1. Meaning those e-bikes can travel long distances Shane;) Just imagine all the scenery they’ll be able to take in.

  5. How is the rail trail an economic benefit for the region when all the infrastructure/ public services are in need of funding now and without the use of infrastructure e.g freight trains to stop degradation of the roads cutting down costs to councils ? Starting a chain reaction that runs all the way up the ladder to federal governments . Even if a rail trail did bring in tourists the only way it could inject money In to infrastructure/ public services is through councils rates so again they’d have to put it on roads because of freight companies. With out permanent population coming to the area healthcare, education none of this gets funding as the township should know. With the rail trail needing numerous constant ways of keeping it safe/ usable causing costs then the benefits would have to be to the whole region of living costs/ advantages. Here’s a simple question how can it help put funding into health care , road infrastructure , public services, etc with out higher rates pushing living costs up? Because running a train will help all of the above

    1. Chris Thompson if it does bring 15000 extra people, we are going to need to do some traffic improvements, car parking, street calming for bike riders.
      No probs, they seem to have some money hiding under the bed somewhere, Sam’s secret fund.

      1. Tanya Langdon infrastructure that is of no advantage to the elderly, sick, unemployed, uneducated

    2. Chris Thompson … 20 years of cobwebs on the rail line hasn’t helped any towns and businesses! Even 10 years ago we could have at least got something going to help local economies, but no, this same comment will re surface in another 10 years if you have your way……

      1. Matt Lynch if I had my way our schools and public infrastructure would be getting fed the millions of dollars a year that goes on subsidies for road freight companies, tar and dirt and trains would be subsidising each other’s uses from passenger to freight.

      2. Matt Lynch the debate isn’t trains v trails
        The debate is, can the councils afford to build and maintain a rail trail?
        Without guaranteed government funding and a sponsor no they can’t!

  6. From New England Times article above.

    “After dropping numbers on the Northern Rivers trail, they’ve had to employ a trail manager to manage and promote it, with an advertised handsome salary package of $100,000 a year plus perks to try to get the pedalling in motion and get people to come back. It seems it’s been ticked and flicked, and everyone’s gone on to their next photo opportunity — another fleeting moment in the rail trail fad. Once you’ve done it, you’ve done it. On to the next leg of the dying horse.”

    My good mate Blind Freddie reckons he can see that ARC Mayor Sham is doing a spoilt brat ”I own the bat and will go home unless I get my way” approach after his many failures to get backing for a bad idea that originated from a Liarbral$ party convention as a strategy to permanently close the Main North LIne for the benefit of the interstate trucking corporations who are long standing ”political donors” to the NOtional$.
    😩😩😩😩😩

    1. Jack Arnold the magic funnel that keeps spilling coins out has to be getting fueled by something. ⚡

    2. Jack you do realise that article was written by Tanya Langdon, one of the biggest purveyors of false news on rail trails and climate change around. She has never set foot on the Northern Rivers rail trail and swallows the propaganda spread by luminaries like Bill Phuckley…

  7. From where I sit it this seems to be a debate about two good ideas, one of which is possible, and one which isn’t.
    I have chosen to support the one that might actually happen, that is, the rail trail.

    1. Peter Szacsvay so far after three attempts and ten years all it’s done is shrink to try and make it fit.
      Meanwhile the budget keeps getting blown all out of proportions. It’s a constant battle of tring to find more money and more money.

    2. Peter Szacsvay Peter, according to Halliburton report that ARC relies on for its business case, it will take 5 yrs after the completion to realise estimated visitor numbers and income. So even if the rail trail is constructed,we will lose our rail line for the foreseeable future. If the council has to return the rail corridor one day, the council will be liable for millions to rebuild the rail line.

    3. Peter Szacsvay plus there is not one financial report with verifiable figures that proves ANY rail trail is of economic benefit.

      1. David, can you show me a report giving the numbers that make the alternative viable? I want to see construction and maintenance, rolling stock, its running costs, staffing and associated housing etc., then expected passenger numbers, and associated income.

  8. Its possible to ride on rear back roads between armidale and guyra.
    Pretty much ride the road paat dumqis station then up tom gully road then at black mtn take the road to guyra.
    The whole way pretty much mimics the rail line but all it needs is a few sign posts to be put up for a few 100k instead of ripping up the line.
    But hey the bike mob are still saying no because they claim that the road is far to dangerous due to passing cars.
    But honestlty how many cars are going to use them back roads other then local farmers.

    1. Steve Smith Not really a family friendly ride though is it? And rail trails aren’t just for those on bike. You can hike them, use bikes, wheelchairs, etc, because the gradual incline isn’t taxing.
      We’ve seen a few cases of when someone loses control of their vehicle and hits cyclists, and thats when they have signage for an event. That road is still used regualry, and by heavy vehicles as well as “local farmers”. Same for the route out to the Ebor Rd.

  9. A rail trail would be a boon for the New England. At least government will look at it. They won’t look at rail.

    1. Warren Coventry a rail trail will do nothing but boom the rates
      The government has committed no funding to the rail trail it will be grant dependant upon its lifetime and as we have learned government grants are not guaranteed even when they manage to be granted

  10. Better off leaving the cyclists on the main roads. So much harder to hit them on the back roads. The rail trail would make it almost impossible

  11. Ahhh again the debate continues over trains v bikes,
    There’s only one debate on the table, is the bike trail affordable???
    That’s all that’s up for debate! 💲

  12. What an absolute joke in the belief that turning the rail corridor into a bike track costing upwards of 50 million is for one second going to turn this area into a tourist Mecca is away with the fairy’s. Comparing it to the Northern Rivers trail in the first place that has 7 million visitors each year that go there for one reason alone and that’s to have a holiday by the sea side rather than whats on offer here with barbwire fences and blackberries. Let’s be honest it’s none other than the definition of insanity.

Leave a comment
Engage respectfully! Posting defamatory or offensive content may get you banned. See our full Terms of Engagement for details.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *